Very interesting, at work we use a "GPG" which my boss has set up & calls the "Group Policy Guidelines." However, in our case I suppose the "GNU Privacy Guard" is much more appropriate.
Thanks Paul, I you really do learn something new every day, lol. Jon On Jun 22, 2010 3:27 PM, "Paul Tagliamonte" <paul...@ubuntu.com> wrote: On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:11 PM, John Kennedy <jak...@roadrunner.com> wrote: > On 06/22/2010 12:32 PM, Jacob Peddicord wrote >> >> Let's definitely get the GPG signing going thi... No no! Quite alright! Gnu Privacy Guard[1][2] ( which is open-source PGP ( haha! ) ) They are a way of establishing absolute identity. We sign them in person, with IDs, to verify who is who. This creates a "Ring of trust" so that any person inside the ring can trust anyone inside the ring by the transitive property of trust :) By keysigning, we make the ring stronger -- It is our DUTY and RIGHT to sign keys ( trying to sound like a military recruiter here ). It's a cool way to meet other nerds, too. [1]: http://www.gnupg.org/ [2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Privacy_Guard Paul > > John > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/... -- #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-us-ohio Post to : ubuntu-us-o...@lists.launchpad.net...
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-us-ohio Post to : ubuntu-us-ohio@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-us-ohio More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp