I will offer what guidance I can, but you leave a lot of blanks in your account and I cannot -- and dare not -- try to guess.
On 14 February 2014 21:04, David Goldsbrough <da...@boavon.plus.com> wrote: > My experience of installing Ubuntu is limited to [...] into a Win XP > environment. Does that mean using WUBI? > Being an evangelical Ubuntu user, after them using a spare Ubuntu 12.04 LTS > machine of mine and a quickish tour around a live CD plus some rather nice > textbook I picked up for a £1 I convinced them they should at least have a > duel-boot machine. > > I downloaded and burnt the 12.04.4 iso 64 bit version. OK, hang on. You do not specify the Windows version they have. Is this a Windows 8.x machine? Or new enough to be, even if it has Win7? If so, then it possibly has UEFI firmware. Did you check? If not, do you have the exact model number, so that we can check with Google? Anyway, with UEFI, there are still many problems and issues around Linux. This is deliberate on Microsoft's part - it is one of their many anticompetitive tactics. However, it means that generally, you should use the latest version, as much work has been done on bootloaders etc. in order to bypass Microsoft's attempted exclusion efforts. This is all readily learned from Google or from watching the Ubuntu support lists. However, one thing is basic: you need to go into the firmware and disable the "SecureBoot" feature, or even if you can install, Windows will "repair" the boot blocks and remove Linux' bootloader. Again, this is common knowledge if you have read about UEFI systems. > I then proceeded to > install but it bombed out What does that mean? Stopped with an error? What error? > having chosen for it to install itself alongside > Windows. I thought it would simply find the Windows partition and roughly > half the available space still left on the drive. [Blink] You let it automatically partition on a machine with important data on it? (!) I hope you had a backup, and preferably 3 of them. > So, I tried again thinking I would choose the third and final option of > "Other" thinking it would simply allow me to manually partition. As I type, > I am now working from my recollection - the machine is now some distance > from me. I seem to recall there was a coloured graphic display (I am colour > blind) showing the existing partitions - but I can't recall exactly how many > it showed - but my friend suggested there were only 4 different colours - > that might be wrong. The colours are not massively important. They denote filesystem type - FAT16, FAT32, NTFS, ext3, ext4 etc. You can get the same info in other ways. > Below that, was a table describing it would seem the > size of the partitions and the free space available. I seem to recall there > was /dev/sda but with no size info against it. Below this there were 4 > indented descriptions; /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2, /dev/sda3. and / dev/sda4. > Three of these were described as NTFS and one FAT32. Can't remember the > sizes, but I'm guessing the largest was the one with Win7 on it. Um. Guessing is, er, not sensible when it comes to disk partitioning. However, 4 partitions is common for a UEFI system. There will be a UEFI boot partition, typically FAT, with some system files in it. You must not touch this at all. Win 7+ tends to make a "System Partition" with some recovery tools in it. This is also common and should also be left alone. It's usually relatively small. Then there will be a Windows C: drive. Then there will often be a manufacturer's recovery partition. That can be resized, often, but preferably only after making physical recovery media if this is possible. However, shrinking C is normally the best way. > At that point, I had no idea what to do and was not confident that no harm > would take place if I proceeded. So, I aborted the installation. Wise. > From what I can recall, Windows and the machine seemed to have the following > partitions > * where the windows original installation files were > * where windows was installed > * an HP partition for something or another > * and another which I can't recall. > > When I used a USB stick at one point it was allocated G: Drive so I'm > assuming the others mentioned above were C, D, E and F (not necessarily in > the same order above) - four in total. Don't forget the optical drive (although you've not specified if there is one). > I have been reading http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Multiple_OS_Installation and > other references. If I understand correctly there is a maximum of 4 > partitions allowed on a hard disk. Whoah whoah whoah whoah! Firstly, no, this is not correct. On hard disks partitioned with the *MBR* format, and only on those, there is a limit of 4 *primary* partitions. However, one of these can be an Extended partition, and inside that, you can have as many logical or secondary partitions as you want. Secondly, no, it is still not correct. It sounds like this was a UEFI system. UEFI systems tend to have big hard disks. MBR only supports drives of up to 2TB. UEFI is one response to this. UEFI systems tend to partition their disks with the GPT format. With GPT, there is no longer any distinction between "primary" and "secondary" partitions, there are no extended partitions or "logical" partitions inside other partitions. With GPT, you can have as many partitions as you wish. (This also applies to other formats such as Windows 2000-2003 "Dynamic Disks", classic Apple format hard disks and others. The primary/secondary thing, the 4-primaries limit, only applies to one partitioning scheme -- MBR -- and nothing else.) > But I am utterly confused as to how to > proceed. It is very important no damage is done to the windows installation > - far too much investment has taken place in terms of time, customisation, > software installs etc has taken place. The data is safe on sticks or in the > cloud. There is also a Ubuntu reputation issue I believe - I have convinced > my friend Ubuntu is so easy and simple compared to Win7. Um. I don't wish to attack you in any way, but if you wish to be an evangelist for Ubuntu and Linux, then you have to understand the context in which it exists. This means an understanding of the PC market, the landscape of technical and competitive issues. This means understanding things like BIOS versus UEFI, MBR versus GPT, SecureBoot and so on. I'm afraid there is more to it than just wandering around telling people how great Linux is. :¬) > Being a great believer in the adage "you mustn't do anything that can't be > easily undone" and you must always have a credible reversion plan, I would > welcome both a forward strategy and some detailed pointers on how I should > proceed to achieve a duel-booting machine. > Many thanks in advance. Sorry about the long post. Um, well, I'd start with taking an external drive of equivalent or greater size along, and using a tool such as Clonezilla to completely duplicate the entire disk, partitions and all, onto other media. Then, I'd clean up the Windows system -- empty all the Temp folders, disable hibernation, delete C:\HIBERFIL.SYS, empty the Recycle Bin, run CHKDSK /F on all visible drives, run a defrag, etc. I'd also check for any available updates to its firmware and apply them if available. Then, I'd use Windows's own Disk Management tool to look at the existing setup of the hard disk, make a clear inventory of partitions, sizes, allocations, filesystems, etc. Only after that, I'd then use the Windows disk manager to shrink the C: drive to make enough space for Ubuntu. Then, I'd go into the firmware setup and disable SecureBoot. Then, I'd check that Windows still booted and ran fine. Then and only then I'd try again with the current version 13.10 of Ubuntu. -- Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk * GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven MSN: lpro...@hotmail.com * Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 * Cell: +44 7939-087884 -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
