On 2 December 2011 01:20, Ivan Wright <quid...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think they needed to move on and change style, we couldn't sit with a > 1995 styled OS forever. > What should be done is to do away with the six month development cycle, > which is far too short for the amount of work needed on Unity. An 8-12 > month cycle would have been far better and allowed time for more bug > fixes.
<snip> Ubuntu does have a 24 month release cycle version, the LTS release. These releases are targeted at stability more than anything else. The next release 12.04 will be an LTS. -Matt Daubney -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
