On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 12:39 +0000, bod...@googlemail.com wrote: > My setup has always been grub on mbr and grub on /boot for each > installation. Either way is pretty simple, the only difficulty I can > forsee is if you change the kernel on one of the installs that doesn't > handle the grub install, then you won't be able to boot to the new > kernel until grub is updated.
I honestly do not see a compelling reason to have a separate /boot at all, except in the case of using an incompatible LVM setup, RAID or filesystem on /. Then you don't have any of the trouble of trying to maintain one /boot with three distros. Regards, Tyler -- "The fundamental article of my political creed is that despotism, or unlimited sovereignty, or absolute power, is the same in a majority of a popular assembly, an aristocratical council, an oligarchical junto, and a single emperor. Equally arbitrary, cruel, bloody, and in every respect diabolical." -- John Adams -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/