On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 12:19 +0000, Barry Drake wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 12:04 +0000, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: > > Thanks for that - sensible advice. I use the LTS versions because I've > > had occasional glitches with the "bleeding edge" releases before, but > > never with the LTS versions. > > My procedure (from now on) will be to clone the present version to an > ISO with CloneZilla, then copy my entire home directory to a pendrive. > Install the new version, copy back my home direectory and if I have > problems, restore the old one. Quick, easy and safe! > > Regards, Barry. > > -- > Barry Drake is a member of the the Ubuntu Advertising team. > http://ubuntuadverts.org/ > > Libreoffice and Open office both have there share of flaws. I think it depends how you use it.
If this is strictly a work machine and you are producing work related docs then stick with OO.o if on the other hand you need a feature that isn't currently available in the version you have then I suggest going with libreoffice it seems to have the developer momentum and community backing that OO.o never quite got. -- Seek That Thy Might Know http://www.davmor2.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
