On 11 October 2010 07:58, Colin Law <clan...@googlemail.com> wrote: > It is not his own site, his initial question was worded slightly > ambiguously. He said that he 'had a page' that failed, but did not > mean that it was his own site.
Ah, apologies... mis-read. > But you are right that the fundamental problem may be the invalid > html. The new version of the renderer may be interpreting the html > differently. The OP should contact the site admin and point out the > errors on the site. If the petsathome site is completely awful HTML then that's rather a sad reflection on their brand... who is to know whether the pet food is edible, the fish being sold healthy or the staff knowledgable if they can't be bothered to spend at least a few minutes on their website to ensure it renders in all browsers? Think I'll stick with Pampurred Pets... they don't really have a website to speak of, but at least it renders ;-) Sean -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
