What the hell? 64 bit version is perfectly fine and I, and many others would recommend it, but only if you have a 64 bit machine, i.e. AMD64, Intel Core2Duo, etc. Perhaps there has been a mistake in wording here, as it is correct to think that most users would be happy with 32 bit Ubuntu, but nevertheless 64 bit Ubuntu is hardly 'bleeding edge'.
> Does any one know why on the ubuntu site here > > http://www.ubuntu.com/desktop/get-ubuntu/download > > They say 64-bit is not recommended for daily useage? A bug has been entered > in launchpad > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-website/+bug/585940 > > Any comments on why this was on the ubuntu page? Im concerned as Im using > 64-bit now for the last few weeks previously I was using 32-bit > > Thanks > > Mark > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-uk/attachments/20100601/a0c37577/attachment.htm > > > ------------------------------ > -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
