Andy Smith wrote: > They are just trying to help as many people as possible without > getting bogged down in technical details. It's a one line > suggestion. Do you really expect a banking leaflet to go into the > pros and cons of secure computing?
Yes I certainly do, I do expect a formal banking code to offer well informed and well worded, competent advice. The Code will be argued against a ubuntu using victim who has used ubuntu without any 'anti virus' software (m'lud) and has had their bank account compromised. Why accept incompetence in a Code of Practice? It is not in any way difficult to reword to be appropriate. -- alan cocks Ubuntu user -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
