i know everyones stance on whats legal and whats not. Rest assured im not breaking any copyright laws! :)
2009/7/14 Daniel Drummond <dmdrummo...@gmail.com> > Sean Miller wrote: > > If you don't have the original image then you probably aren't legally > > entitled to remove the watermark. > > > > It's as simple as that... > > > > If you work for a company, as you say you do, and they've asked you to > > re-engineer the picture then ask them for the original rather than the > > watermarked version. > > > > If you don't... well, find something better to do with your life than > > bootlegging folks' images. > > > > Sean > > > > > > And there I thought the principles of law operated on an innocent until > proven guilty basis. > > Perhaps he accidentally deleted the original. > > Perhaps the photograph in question was watermarked with a website name, > but then the website changed name, and the only image is the one on the > website. > > Perhaps a company lost the original. > > Perhaps an ex-employee of the company took the photo on company time, > for the company, and when fired for surfing the internet too much during > company time left on bad terms and decided to take the original with > them. Technically the company owns the photograph, but would be left > without the original. > > > Lets not pre-judge reasons for wanting to remove a watermark. It could > be legitimate. > > Dan > > -- > ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/ > -- Javad
-- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
