Eddie Bernard wrote: > Tim Powys-Lybbe wrote: > > >> Surely for the average user a LTS version would be better, such as 8.04? >> Development versions and upgrades could raise severe antagonisms to you. >> > > Fair cop, glad you pointed that out. I need to curb my enthusiasm for > always wanting to be on the bleeding edge... > > Eddie > > (apologies if this doesn't thread correctly, I messed up my mailing > list subscription at first...) > > to offer a contrary view I would always go for the latest released version fully updated. The customer is likely to update it anyway, or think they are not getting the newest and shinyest operating system otherwise. LTS is arguably better for servers or corporate desktop rollouts (if you don't have landscape or any management tools) but for sellability to geeks and others go for new and shiny. If you can launch on April 23rd with Jauny pre-installed you might get a burst of interest. (was thinking of doing that myself)
Alan. -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
