Chris Rowson wrote: > As I'm sure that most of you are aware a discussion has taken place on > the mailing list as to the legitimacy and accuracy of the PoC election > process. > > I'm becoming somewhat concerned at the direction these discussions are > taking, as on occasion (in my humble opinion) they may be regarded as > coming close to a personal attack. > > I'd like to take this opportunity to direct you all to the Ubuntu Code > of Conduct which many of us have signed. If you'd like to read it, you > can find it here: www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct. > > Please pay close attention to the section entitled 'Be Respectful'. It > reads "We may not always agree, but disagreement is no excuse for poor > behaviour and poor manners. We might all experience some frustration > now and then, but we cannot allow that frustration to turn into a > personal attack." > > Lets not degenerate into a rabble please, I'm sure that this can be sorted > out. > > Perhaps an easy way to sort this out would be to simply poll the > thoughts of the interested parties without all of the emotion. > > The question is quite simply do you want the election to be held > again, yes or no? > Maybe we need another launchpad vote on whether we should have another vote? And a vote about whether a vote about voting is really necessary? At what point does all this just become silly?
Personally, this is dragging on much longer than it should. Both parties that were in contention for the role have said that they are happy with the outcome. Based on the number of people active in the IRC channel / on the mailing list, I doubt very much that there would be enough participants to put one of the other candidates in the picture. I say leave it as it is, and note down what went wrong, so next time the same mistakes won't be made. Chris Oattes. -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
