Hey Dave, I dont usually do these 'point by point' replys, but feel it is best in this case
> * A couple of the leaflets had a Creative Commons license attached, > whilst others didn't. Those that did not not have a URL for the license > - this should be included. Personally I think anything we (as a team) > produce should be made available under a CC license or stated that it is > in the public domain, otherwise ownership isn't clear. Yeah agreed. > > * None of the leaflets indicate that "Ubuntu is a registered trademark > of Canonical Ltd. and is used without permission." The same for Linux, > OpenOffice, Firefox etc. I'd avoid going down the GNU/Linux rabbit hole > though. I didn't realise we had to do that :S If thats the case I will add it on to the graphics one > > * The 'grass' image used on the leaflets - is that the actual Microsoft > image? If so we can't use it. nah, as mentioned earlier in the thread > > * Capitalisation. I know it's 'different' to use all lower case - I've > done it myself - but in terms of readability it sucks *and* looks > unprofessional. We may be volunteers, but that shouldn't stop us from > taking pride. I think the reason was to keep it in style with the ubuntu logo, not to look different. If it really sucks that much though It can be changed > > * Lack of links to Ubuntu-UK. We should be directing people to our > community for support/advice etc. Stick our logo on there as well. Which leaflets are you referring to? > > * Purely aesthetics, but I don't like the font on the front page of the > graphics leaflet. No offense, but any other ideas? > > Fantastic work by everyone who has contributed to these. Thanks :o) Regards, -- Matthew G Larsen > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +44(0)7739 785 249 -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
