On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 20:14, David Farning <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Luke Faraone <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 07/12/2010 05:10 PM, Edward Cherlin wrote: >>> Apparently the >>> sugar-activities package does not contain the data needed to identify >>> the conflict at the time of package selection. >> >> The fix for this would be to have sugar-activities Conflict and Replace >> the sugar-*-activities it contains in the debian/control file. Let me >> know if you want me to handle it, David. >> > Manu has asked Dipankar to look at it. Would be great if you could > explain what is happening and how to fix it. > > I expect that we will stumble across this quite frequently over the > next couple months. ie xoirc being rename irc ....
We have only a modest number of Ubuntu sugar activities where this conflict can arise. Is there a place where our packaging process is documented, so that this can be added to the workflow? > david > -- Edward Mokurai (默雷/धर्ममेघशब्दगर्ज/دھرممیگھشبدگر ج) Cherlin Silent Thunder is my name, and Children are my nation. The Cosmos is my dwelling place, the Truth my destination. http://www.earthtreasury.org/ -- Ubuntu-sugarteam mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-sugarteam
