So, would it be acceptable if pyjamas was shipped in Lucid but without pyjamas-desktop? This seems like the easiest solution to implement. For Maverick, we can either continue to do that, have it use WebKit, or get python-xpcom supported, but the latter two are outside my realm of expertise.
-- Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Sugar Team, which is subscribed to sugar-hulahop in ubuntu. Status in “pyjamas” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “sugar-browse-activity-0.86” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “sugar-hulahop” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “xulrunner-1.9.1” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: Binary package hint: xulrunner-1.9.1 See: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Lucid/FirefoxNewSupportModel/ https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-lucid-new-firefox-support-model sugar-hulahop depends on python-xpcom, which was removed from xulrunner in 1.9.2 and distributed separately. There's a chance that we will package that separately in maverick and reintroduce these packages, but, for the time being it has to go (along with anything that depends on it) -- Ubuntu-sugarteam mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-sugarteam
