But On Tue Oct 25 2022 at 05:50:44 UTC, Steve Langasek wrote: > I am prepared to argue in this case that a full-upstream update in SRU > would be appropriate on the grounds that the package is completely unusable > and therefore the regression potential is nil, and has a better chance > of correctness than cherry-picking individual commits and hoping we've > caught all the type errors.
This doesn't obviously fix the problem of the missing dependency. I > will check with the rest of the SRU team how they would want this handled. I would like to add my vote to this issue. I am a music teacher relying heavily on Frescobaldi. It was never broken in the last 10 years on UBS and this time I was taken by surprise, hoping that I can easily install 3.2 from code - but failed miserably and wasted many hours. I understand if nobody has the time to fix this. But I would like to say my opinion on the importance of Frescobaldi. Music production, performance and education are closely connected. Many, if not most of us musicians teach in addition to music making. *Especially during and after Covid. * In that light, Ubuntu Studio could reconsider the importance of Frescobaldi. It plays a crucial role in music education (alongside Lilypond, of course:-) and should have a status same as Ardour or Jack; and not treated as a secondary 'add-on'. Viktor Mastoridis Music producer and educator
-- ubuntu-studio-users mailing list ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users
