On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 06:03:00PM +0000, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > We pushed 6.1 out, and migrated, on generic only, to migrate lots of > > > packages in proposed, specifically nvidia & everything entangled with > > > it, and thus unblock autopkgtesting of all the userspace packages > > > which were otherwise failing on v5.19. There is no intention to port > > > all flavours to 6.1.
> > Again, this is one of the reasons we had do miss testing week among another > it was a mistake to skip testing week. you should have tested ubuntu > studio during the testing week like all the other flavours did. As > there are a lot of changes in lunar, that landed and affect ubuntu > studio. For example, all cloud images which use various cloud kernel > flavours, based on v5.19 did participate. > Can you explain who made the call to skip testing week? as to me, it > seemed, it's a requirement to release a flavour. Is studio going to > skip Lunar release? Testing week is not a release-team-driven activity and flavor engagement in it has no bearing on a flavor's eligibility for inclusion in a stable release. Flavors are required to hit a beta milestone and a release milestone. How they conduct their activities to ensure that these milestones are releasable is for them to decide. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel