On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 08:46:31PM -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote: > Hi Aleix, > > On Thursday, September 8, 2022 1:30:02 PM PDT Aleix Pol wrote: > > Note that Discover is just using PackageKit, so it's a problem to address > > there. > > > > If despite having Discover be "very, very flawed" you want to have a > > discussion one day about how to make it fit for your purpose, I'll be > > happy to join and see what can be done. > > > > That was not meant as an insult to your work, and I'm terribly sorry if it > arrived that way. Honestly, Discover is a fine piece of software, especially > as > a software store and I quite enjoy using it as such. However, I think you're > right, my observations toward the "very, very flawed" might be better > directed > at PackageKit since it doesn't have the capability to do autoremove like I'm > suggesting for software updates.
It's not hard to implement, it's basically
bool doAutoRemove = _config->FindB("APT::Get::AutomaticRemove", false);
bool doAutoRemoveKernels =
_config->FindB("APT::Get::AutomaticRemove::Kernels", false);
bool hideAutoRemove = _config->FindB("APT::Get::HideAutoRemove");
std::unique_ptr<APT::CacheFilter::Matcher> kernelAutoremovalMatcher;
if (doAutoRemoveKernels && !doAutoRemove)
{
kernelAutoremovalMatcher =
APT::KernelAutoRemoveHelper::GetProtectedKernelsFilter(Cache, true);
}
Cache->MarkAndSweep();
SortedPackageUniverse Universe(Cache);
// look over the cache to see what can be removed
for (auto const &Pkg: Universe)
{
if (Cache[Pkg].Garbage)
{
if(Pkg.CurrentVer() != 0 || Cache[Pkg].Install())
if(Debug)
std::cout << "We could delete " << APT::PrettyPkg(Cache, Pkg) <<
std::endl;
if (doAutoRemove || (kernelAutoremovalMatcher != nullptr &&
(*kernelAutoremovalMatcher)(Pkg)))
{
if(Pkg.CurrentVer() != 0 &&
Pkg->CurrentState != pkgCache::State::ConfigFiles)
Cache->MarkDelete(Pkg, purgePkgs, 0, false);
else
Cache->MarkKeep(Pkg, false, false);
}
at the right place after calling Upgrade().
Though I don't know maybe it needs the following code bits too where we recover
packages we now have broken.
// we could have removed a new dependency of a garbage package,
// so check if a reverse depends is broken and if so install it again.
Probably it makes sense to extract the non-CLI bits of DoAutoremove() in
apt-private
to apt-pkg, so PackageKit and others just have one function to call to do any
autoremovals
that should be done by policy.
--
debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
ubuntu core developer i speak de, en
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
