Thanks, Steve! I'll go ahead and proceed with the +us plan seeing as how +repack just simply didn't seem like a good description. :)
On Saturday, August 27, 2022 4:12:09 PM PDT Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Erich, > > Given the options the Debian maintainer presented, it sounds like they are > not planning themselves on fixing this in the current upstream version. > > Having checked that this is the case, I think it's ok for us in Ubuntu to > upload with a new tarball versioned as +repack (or +us - ubuntu source, > analagous to the +ds extension used in Debian), relying on the fact that we > are unlikely to need to sync any critical fixes from Debian between now and > the packaging of the next upstream release. > -- Erich Eickmeyer Project Leader - Ubuntu Studio Member - Ubuntu Community Council
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-devel
