Hi On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 3:24 AM Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:20 PM Sergio Durigan Junior > <sergio.duri...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > On Monday, June 26 2023, I wrote: > > > > > Bug Triage > > > ========== > > > > > > ### https://pad.lv/1991441 | Confirmed | glusterfs | glusterd and > > > glusterfs crashes after dist-upgrade from foca… | > > > > > > armhf + illegal instruction = fun. I subscribed ubuntu-server, but I > > > don't have an armhf system available to test the problem. I'll see if I > > > can reserve one. > > > > I looked into this one and posted my findings there. > > Interesting Sergio, > I wonder if > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/1991441/comments/5 > into > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/3911 > into > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/702 > > Doesn't this sort of imply we should remove armhf binaries from > glusterfs going forward. > If there can be a fix for the problem that is there in the existing > versions affected (jammy AFAICS) great, we'll serve it. > But going forward more of that is gonna happen. > > WDY(all)T of removing armhf in glusterfs in >Mantic and asking Debian > if they want to do the same?
+1, I had an encounter with armhf incompatibility before[1] in glusterfs, which was fixed, but at that time upstream already said that it was pure luck it was fixed, because they don't care about 32bits. 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glusterfs/+bug/1951408 -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
