Hi Christian, > Maybe when you go for adcli and sssd in LP #1868703 again - they might > have their dependency to libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit be versioned to > be greater or equal the fixed cyrus_sasl2?
That is an excellent idea. I will do exactly that. I have prepared a new debdiff for adcli which adds a dependency to libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit at the new upload version of 2.1.27~101-g0780600+dfsg-3ubuntu2.2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1906627/+attachment/5441872/+files/lp1906627_adcli_option_one.debdiff Thanks for suggesting! Matthew On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:28 AM Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:45 AM Matthew Ruffell > <matthew.ruff...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > ... > > Again, I apologise for the regression, and things are on their way to being > > fixed. > > Thanks for jumping on it once it was identified. > > One suggestion for the coming related uploads. > Do you think it would make sense to ensure that the now-known-bad > combinations of packages won't be allowed together. > Maybe when you go for adcli and sssd in LP #1868703 again - they might > have their dependency to libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit be versioned to > be greater or equal the fixed cyrus_sasl2? > > > > [1] > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1906627/+attachment/5441530/+files/lp1906627_cyrus_sasl2_bionic.debdiff > > [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1906627 -- ubuntu-server mailing list ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
