Blueprint changed by Chuck Short:

Whiteboard changed:
- Discussion is needed to confirm what virtualisation technology will be
- used in ARM/Openstack environments.
+ UDS Discussion Points:
  
- Work may also include ensuring OpenStack charms are able to be
- successfully deployed via MAAS/Juju.
+ Goal is to make ARM Server work as well as x86/amd64 server.
+  
+ What issues are we are of? Please enumerate below.
  
- -- Please can we document  goals, use cases,  assumptions for the
- quantal release cycle, and fill out the work items to support this
- activity. Specifically, can we define the infrastructure changes on
- OpenStack that will need to be changed to support ARM following the
- template @ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BlueprintSpec [a.rosales]
+     python-greenlet? I don't see a newer package available yet.
+ 
+     glance?
+ 
+     Upload image to glance... it usually... n-c has no idea of arch.
+ 
+     Nova-client (test)
+ 
+     Glance-client (test)
+ 
+ Nova MaaS/Baremetal is another issue. At OpenStack Summit a trio presented on 
this wherein an ARM|x86|Tilera Board is treated more or less like a virtual 
machine. Much (all?) of the infrastructure is already in place to do this.  
Likely we need to exercise, test-automate, etc this. (Look for Baremetal in the 
OpenStack Design Summit)  Do BOTH LXC and Baremetal Need to test scheduler and 
create scheduler plugins.
+ euca2ools (existing issue doesn't recognize arm arch) Use arch-detect (part 
of d-i)..
+ At image build time.
+ lARM lab needs to report into Gerritt
+ Swift? 
+ Quantum?
+ Horizon?
+ Keystone?
+ Glance?
+ nova-volume: Cinder?  iscsi nova-volumes (needs tb tested)\ ceph needs to be 
tested
+ any issues with the underlying tech:
+ libvirt (detect CPU)
+ RabbitMQ
+ Memcached
+ Apache
+ Django
+ MySQL (had some x86 assemblers? mysql falls back to handle it...) Does 
performance "suck"? NCommander: atomic functions ARM uses the built-ins. Other 
features (crypto) have asm as well but we don't build those features. INNOdb is 
the default in precise/quantal. yassl has asm (for other archs.)
+ openssl (server side): openssl-test can help, gnu-tls may also need checked.
+ OpenVSwitch
+ MAAS integration?
+ Juju?  colocation, in particular?
+ LXC?
+ Assume KVM is deferred?
+ Do we want to devel/test/support any hybrid issues?
+ Similar question for Host Aggregates (an ARM aggregate and an amd64 aggregate 
in a single Nova implementation)? Or Nova Cells?
+ Do cloud-init questions need to go here?  cloud-init has some hard-coding to 
archives.ubuntu.com (but ports.ubuntu.com is more apropos for ARM).
+ Is continuous integration testing on ARM feasible?
+ Images? What images do we have for nova compute? Make sure we have some and 
they actually work. LXC
+ QEMU cloud images ahve been tested and work once the port.ubuntu.com change 
has been made.
+ Hardware availability is an on-going issue.
+ Question: OpenStack is being backported to the LTS. Do we need to 
test/measure/use/support these backports for ARM?
+ 
+ User Stories
+ 
+ Rutager is a system admin who wants a private cloud with a low power
+ footprint.
+ 
+ ABC micro is a OEM provider who sells an ARM server and wants to provide
+ a private cloud in the box
+ 
+ Assumptions:
+ 
+ Work will be done upstream to make ARM a first class citizen in openstack
+ Hardware will be available for testing
+ 
+ Test Cases
+ 
+ See above

-- 
OpenStack Deployment on ARM Server
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-deployment-on-arm

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Reply via email to