My agreement was with point 1. I don't agree with point 2, as that is a
diversion from the libcgroup upstream and debian package. They do not
simply want all cgroups mounted separately by default. Rather, they
want it to be very configurable. So I wouldn't object strongly to
adding the extra cgroups to the configuration file (though I think that
change should simply be done through debian), but I think it is wrong to
change how the cgroups are mounted.
The libcgroup package was never simply a package to mount all cgroups
and provide set/get cgroup settings. It has a specific purpose (which
it cannot quite meet in a race-free way) of flexible, configurable
cgroup management by users, groups, and programs.
Perhaps what you'd actually like is to add a simple cgroup set/get
program to cgroup-lite.
I am going to mark this bug incomplete while awaiting your feedback on
the following proposal: I'd like to change the title of this bug to
simply be 'cgconfig upstart job should start earlier', and make that
change and p and q. (Then merge debian's new version into q). Point 2
I'd like to be handled through debian.
** Changed in: libcgroup (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libcgroup in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995956
Title:
cgconfig upstart job should start earlier and mount all available
cgroup types by default
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcgroup/+bug/995956/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
