Yes, I think that Debian bug report #483098 gives the background information needed to understand what's going on here.
Bind9 should certainly not by default send its (loopback) address to resolvconf. Bind9 should only send its address to resolvconf if it is known that named can provide general DNS. Seems to me to be rather important. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933723 Title: resolvconf creating bogus resolv.conf file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/933723/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
