On Saturday 02 April 2011 02:23:21 Clint Byrum wrote: > Kern, does this mean that there is an explicit fix in the code of 5.2.0 > that will make this problem go away on Qt 4.6.2 ?
There have been a very large number of changes to bat from 5.0.x to 5.2.0, including new features, bug fixes, and particularly seg fault fixes. I am sorry, I don't remember the specifics, and since I did not explicitly reproduce the reported bug, I am not sure there is an explicit fix, but I think so. > > While I do think we should put 5.2.0 in backports when it arrives, if > the fix is simple it might be worth patching 5.0.1 so it works in lucid. There were a lot of changes, and I believe we have a significant number in the Director too, so any backporting might not be easy. You are free to try backporting but it is not something that I am personally going to do. > > This one is really hard to confirm as I don't have any files to restore > in my test bacula. Is there a shorter test case? I don't know as I haven't explicitly reproduced the reported bug. > > I'm going to mark this as Incomplete, pending a shorter test case and/or > answers from Kern. If its too hard to test, and/or too hard to fix in > lucid, it might just have to be a "Won't Fix". OK. I am not sure what your procedure is -- it might be good to note "fixed in 5.2.x" providing that is really the case. * Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) > Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735369 Title: Bacula Admin Tool (bat) does not work well with Qt 4.6.2 in Lucid -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
