On Wednesday 24 September 2008 19:32:44 Ante Karamatić wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:58:46 -0000 > > Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't understand why you cannot start Bacula after the network is > > up and running and DNS is serving names. That is how it works on all > > other systems. We have never run into this problem elsewhere, so I > > cannot understand why it is "unresolvable". > > Avahi is an implementation of the DNS Service Discovery and Multicast > DNS specifications for Zeroconf Networking. It uses 'special' '.local' > domain. > > Problem is that network is up, but the user is using 'hostname.local' > FQDN. This FQDN isn't managed by DNS, so it isn't resolvable. This > domain is managed by interaction between all computers, which over > Zeroconf talk to each other and arrange their FQDN inside '.local' > domain. This can take a minute or two. This is why Bacula is started > before the FQDN is resolvable. > > We could resolve this problem if we would stall booting of all services > untill avahi registers server, but this isn't a nice solution :/. > Upstart enables state driven booting, so all services would boot up, > except those that depend on avahi. Those will wait until upstart > declares that mDNS is up. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeroconf
OK, thanks for the explanation. I was unaware of the Zeroconf problems, and agree that stalling all services at boot time is not a good solution. I am going to note this because I imagine it will come up in other distros ... -- bacula-fd does not start when installed via bacula-client https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/241480 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs