You obviously misunderstood my reply to your question (which maybe I misunderstood in turn). You asked me:
> What is the different between a team member and you on testing the bug? Which I interpreted as "why would you expect anybody from the QA team to test a bug more than you'd expect anybody else to"? I was replying to that, and I explicitly stressed: > (note, before you ban me, this is a "generic 'you'" and an hypothetic 'if') > If you don't care about helping Ubuntu QA, why are you in this list in the first place? [note an important difference between this question and mine: I asked "if you don't care *that much*", not "if you don't care", by which I meant "enough to run a one-command-line test to check whether the issue is actually fixed in Trusty"] I do care about helping Ubuntu QA. That's why I am in this list, and that's why I wrote to it to inform you that there's a bug that is incorrectly marked as fixed in Wily, which I thought was an issue that should be of interest to the QA team. I am surprised that a QA team member (not you) would rather spend their time explaining why it's not so important to correct the status of the bug, than spend a tiny fraction of that time to actually do it. 2016-07-08 14:33 GMT+02:00 Alberto Salvia Novella <[email protected]>: > Alberto: > >> If you don't care about helping Ubuntu QA, why are you in this list in >> the first place? >> > > Oh men, I obviously should not answer messages like these. As they can > turn a good day into something worse. > > So I'm moving to the happy band, thank you. > > > -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
