> > If a test result for a package in week 1 of a dev cycle shows a fail and > has a bug filed against it why is that invalid in week 20 if it hasn't been > fixed? > My point wasn't that. Then the QA person would have to reattach the bug(not so hard if there was somewhat of a history).
> I'm not really sure how removing test results for a cycle is useful. > > I would expect QA people to know if a bug reported against a package is > still relevant or not. > Because of regression. If there is package regression and the QA tracker shows a passed result, then it would be a little confusing to see a bug report concerning the same package by the same person, don't you think? -- Have a nice day, Simon Quigley -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
