[Sorry for the poor quoting but many of my recent emails have been deleted]

Happy new year to all QA ubuntu members =). Since some time ago, launchpad has been used to track the progress on manual|automatic tests for Ubuntu and derived
flavours (kubuntu, lubuntu, xubuntu, etc).

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-autopilot-tests/

Recently however, Paul White has pointed out that some of the flavours use
other mediums to track progress on this aspect, eg. Kubuntu uses
https://trello.com/kubuntu.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-tests/+bug/1183934

Should keep using launchpad to track manual|automatic test for ubuntu derived
flavours?

Javier,

I haven't replied until now as I thought others had said all I wanted to say but in the last few hours I've actually received a communication to say that may be there could be a use for the Kubuntu test cases. There might be some considerable work involved in getting them used and the results analysed though.

I'm obviously out of my depth here and sincerely apologise for marking so many bugs as invalid without reference to yourself although I will say that I was prompted to do so and fully agreed with that advice by taking the action that I took. :)

Before I do any further damage I'm going back to being a humble user, leaving the role of being a contributor to those that are better equipped to deal with such decisions.

I may not see any reply that you make as I'm not only resigning from the team but un-subscribing from the mailing list.

Once again, my apologies.

Paul white
[email protected]


--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality

Reply via email to