On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 12:32 -0400, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > I know, lots of emails today -- it's quite a week to be in QA :-) > > We've been chatting on and off via the list about this idea of cadence > testing, and the struggles we've hit. I wanted to share my thoughts > and ideas on what's gone right and what's gone wrong with cadence > testing this cycle. > > http://www.theorangenotebook.com/2012/08/the-grand-cadence-experiment.html > Very well written post, based on what you said I agree. I hope we can iterate forward and improve the process. I have complete faith that with your help the QA community can do just that.
> Secondly, I want to say a big thank you to everyone who participated > in these cadence testing events. They were a mass of confusion and > pain for you, I know. We learned many things from executing the > events, and I'm proud to say together we achieved what was asked of > us. Going forward however, I'd like us to continue the conversation of > bringing in value and being a larger part of the release process. My > goal is to keep you informed about what's going on so that can happen. > We'll keep iterating forward! > I would also like to extend a big thank you to everyone who participated... my life is crazy right now or I would have joined in with you guys... I will make my best efforts to participate the next cycle. Great work everyone! Charles -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
