Ok, the results are in and have been discussed by astraljava and myself during today's meeting. Here they are (note is is confusing because the small numbers by the times show the people who CAN'T attend @ that time instead of those that can). If you mouse over a time it gives you the proper details.
http://whenisgood.net/mzs4etp/results/x83kbr >From this I picked a time from each day that had a high number of people who could meet at that time and created one last poll to "choose" the best time to meet. All the times are in UTC. I would like us to close the poll this week and choose and announce the new time for our next meeting next week. I realize this may be a little hectic if Monday is chosen, but I'd like to transition sooner rather than drag this out :-) https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFRBUjJ6ZVN0dk9YVDBvbmVhQ2VpQmc6MQ As always, speak up if you have ideas or thoughts about cycling times/formats, etc. I want everyone to be able to attend of course, but also find the meetings useful and productive. Feedback is always welcomed. Thanks everyone, Nicholas On 03/15/2012 02:26 PM, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: > As discussed at our last IRC meeting, I am including a poll to see > what times/days would work best for us to meet. I'll leave the poll > open until after our next meeting, during which we can discuss the > results, and make any scheduling changes based upon them if we feel > it's necessary. When filling out the poll, pay attention to the > timezone! Make sure you select your timezone so the times make sense. > > http://whenisgood.net/mzs4etp > > > Nicholas > > > >
-- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
