Thank you all for the feedback, I am putting together the list to discuss with them. I will keep you posted in case you want to join the discussion, I still don't know which format it will be.
Gema On 14/12/11 10:40, Vadim Rutkovsky wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've investigated CC a little and here are some info on our requirements: > - Test Case Definition > No separate field for Assumption section. I guess, we should add > this to Description > - Test Case ID > We may add this to testcase name and use as an ID > - Be able to have status for test cases (Draft/Under Review/Active/Inactive). > This is implemented. The only status missing is Under Review - > however, several users are required for this, so I could not try this > by myself. > - Be able to link with launchpad defects > Implemented > - Import testcases > Implemented, a bit buggy right now. A Gherkin-like format is used > > TODO: > - OpenID registration > - HTML in test description/steps > (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667658) > - Export testcases (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627785) > > > 2011/12/13 Alex Lourie <djay...@gmail.com>: >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Vadim Rutkovsky <roig...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'd also like import/export functionality (in plain text, at least) >>> and some API for advanced reporting >>> >> >> +100! I forgot I wanted it too. >> >>> >>> 2011/12/13 Alex Lourie <djay...@gmail.com>: >>>> How about test cases versioning? What is the test case needs fixing? >>> Agree with Alex, however we may cope with it using tags (e.g. >>> 'stable', 'for-review' etc.) >>> >> >> Interesting idea. While I'd prefer versioning, tags could work in absence of >> it. >> >>> >>> -- >>> Vadim Rutkovsky >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Alex Lourie > -- Gema Gomez-Solano <gema.gomez-sol...@canonical.com> QA Team https://launchpad.net/~gema.gomez Canonical Ltd. http://www.canonical.com -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
