Hi folks, I would appreciate your feedback about interpreting test results across multiple test runs. For example, consider the following test results for the first test run of a given project:
test1: Pass test2: Pass test3: Fail Then, consider the following partial test results for a second test run of the same project: test1: Pass The second test run only executed the first test and, for the sake of this example, we can safely assume that this was deliberate and the test runner process did not crash and burn. My question is: can we make any reasonable assumptions about the tests that were not run? This can be a matter of opinion where one extreme might not make any assumptions at all, whereas another extreme might assume that test results remain the same until proven otherwise. So, I'm calling for your opinions on what you consider is reasonable. Thanks! -- Marc Tardif <marc.tar...@canonical.com> Freenode: cr3, Jabber: c...@jabber.org 1024D/72679CAD 09A9 D871 F7C4 A18F AC08 674D 2B73 740C 7267 9CAD -- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
