On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:09:00 -0400 Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 04:44:42 pm C de-Avillez wrote: > > Additionally we briefly discussed changes to the regression-* tags > > usage: it seems the current workflow is a bit confusing, and we > > would like to simplify it by abandoning usage of > > 'regression-potential' (used for potential/confirmed regressions on > > the Ubuntu release currently in development); instead we would use > > 'regression-release <codename of Ubuntu dev release>'. If a > > regression is confirmed, then a nomination to the affected Ubuntu > > release is done. Note that nominations are already used for this. > > > > We would like feedback & suggestions about this potential change; > > we feel this simple change will streamline the process, and make > > these bugs palatable for triagers. > > This should be discussed on ubuntu-devel too. It doesn't just > affect QA and triage. Yes, of course. We, during the meeting, explicitly stated we would contact -devel. It just happened I forgot to state it here (but it is in the minutes). Sorry for this. ..C.. -- C de-Avillez IRC: hggdh This email (and any attachments) is digitally signed using GNUpg (http://gnupg.org). The public key is available at http://pgp.mit.edu. The key Id is 0xD3133E56.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-qa mailing list Ubuntu-qa@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-qa
