So it would be interesting display the Voltage.
Cheers,
Cesar

17.01.2017, 15:52, "Marcin Xc" <gtride...@yahoo.com>:
> There is one more thing I'd like to add to this discussion that You can see 
> in the picture:
> http://ep.com.pl/cache/images/norm/3/1/7/c3JjPS9pbWFnZXMvbm9ybS8zLzEvNy8xMzMxN2FrdW11bGF0b3J5X3J5c18yMC5qcGcmdz05MDAmaD01OTQ=_srcb9bd5f071626572b62658662f22e4c3d.jpg
>
> The green line "Pojemnosc" is capacity. The red one "Napiecie ogniwa" is 
> voltage. In a healthy Li-Ion battery You can pretty easily display the 
> capacity if You know the voltage. At least till ~~4V. Then You see these 
> magical 99% that need longer. Why they need longer You can see in the 
> picture: when the voltage says 4-4.1V the battery has only 83% of its 
> capacity, in this case.
> What is the other case? The other case are different Li-ion Batteries. No of 
> Your batteries is >Li<-ion. They are for example LiFeYPO4 or LiFePo4 also 
> called more correctly LCO, LMO, LMC, NMC, LFP. They have different capacity 
> at their 4-4.1V. If You see on the display that Your battery is 99% full it 
> can mean that it has something about 3,9-4,1V and that means it is only 
> 60-80% full (picture).
>
> I still wonder why I do not have absolutely ANY problems with my battery 
> (E4.5, OTA14) and the only answer that came to my mind is that perhaps my 
> battery is different than Yours? If any of You would like me to crash test my 
> battery, just write me what I shall do to join the bug report. There are only 
> two things I won't do: I will not let the capacity drop under 20-30% level (I 
> already experienced that this phone doesn't like it) and I will not leave my 
> phone connected to the charger longer than needed when it reaches the 100% 
> level.
>
> One more thing: between the physical "+/-" battery and the physical phone 
> there are always electronic pieces that tells You the voltage and that are 
> responsible for it. So the real battery (as we can see and touch in a car) 
> stays in a phone/Notebook/mp3player always behind a kind of an 
> overcharging/totally discharging/overheat protecting firewall. If Your phone 
> doesn't stand up it doesn't mean that the battery is under 2V or 1V, zero and 
> empty. It means that the electronic security doesn't allow You to turn it on 
> any more to protect Your battery chemically.
>
> Best regards
>
> Marcin
>
> ----------------------------------------
> From: Selene Scriven <selene.scri...@canonical.com>
> To: Matthias Apitz <g...@unixarea.de>; ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 7:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Battery statistics and flashing bricks
>
> * Matthias Apitz <g...@unixarea.de> wrote:
>> Yes, exactly like this, with meters in addition.
>
> Although not shown in the picture, I have the phones instrumented
> with meters along the path for primary power and USB, and use it
> to check power consumption on each new build.
>
> For example, here is a summary of one type of krillin power usage
> for 50 builds during a time when a relevant bug was introduced:
>
>   
> http://toykeeper.net/tmp/phablet/power/krillin-rc-proposed,en-power_usage_display_on-287-336-smooth.png
>
> Toward the right side, it spikes for several builds until we had
> the bug isolated and fixed.  The red columns indicate when it
> thinks there is a new bug, and green is when it thinks something
> was improved.  The blue area is where it expects the result to be
> based on recent measurements.  So, bug found and fixed.  If I
> recall correctly, this particular bug was the reason an OTA
> release got delayed.
>
> Then a few builds later, in r335, it noticed an unusually high
> variation between individual measurements, and marked that build
> for inspection.  For context, here is a more detailed graph for
> r334, when everything was behaving:
>
>   http://toykeeper.net/tmp/phablet/power/krillin.334.display.png
>
> The green section is the part of the measurement it "counts" for
> the test.  Red sections mean USB was plugged in so those values
> aren't relevant.  In this case, it's just letting the phone idle
> with the screen on right after booting.  Five measurements, and
> they're all pretty consistent.
>
> Then in the next build it had one measurement which didn't look
> quite right:
>
>   http://toykeeper.net/tmp/phablet/power/krillin.335.display.png
>
> So it marked that build for inspection, with detailed logs
> available to help identify what happened.
>
> This is how we've been detecting and fixing power consumption
> bugs, making sure each new OTA is the same or better than the
> ones before it.  But that's mostly for userspace bits.  Kernel
> and firmware issues are trickier.
>
>> hat I do not understand is the issue my wife sees from time to
>> time: her device shows 50% or 60% of remaining capacity, for
>> longer time (due to nearly no use of the device), and within
>> minutes the capacity goes to zero and the BQ E4.5 is a brick in
>> her pocket. I understand what you say, Selene, about
>> discrepancies in the layers an error in interpreting the
>> voltage, but I do no see, how can lead this to 50%-to-0% in a
>> few minutes. Have you found something, which explains this?
>
> Yes.  Especially when a device spends a lot of time in standby.
> The daemon which generates that percentage estimate can sometimes
> go a long time between updates...  and when it does update it has
> a tendency to lag.
>
> For example, one day I was testing by manually changing the input
> voltage and recording how the phone responded.  What I found was
> that the kernel's reported voltage lagged behind the actual
> voltage when the actual voltage decreased quickly, but it tracked
> closely when voltage increased.  Additionally, it sometimes took
> a while for the reported percent (and built-in charge graph) to
> catch up.
>
> In this graph comparison, the green line is what the power supply
> voltage was set to, the blue line is what the kernel reported,
> and the rainbow graph is a screenshot of what the phone reports
> to its user.  After manually dropping the voltage to "almost
> empty", it took about 40 minutes for the UI to catch up and it
> did the thing where it went suddenly from like 60% to 0%.
>
>   http://toykeeper.net/tmp/phablet/power/battgraphs.png
>
> Then a bit later (I let it keep measuring), I noticed some other
> odd behavior.  Although it hadn't noticed earlier that the
> voltage went back up, when it finally updated again it changed
> the UI's rainbow graph retroactively:
>
>   http://toykeeper.net/tmp/phablet/power/battgraphs.2.png
>
> After the kernel noticed the increased voltage, the UI took over
> an hour to update.
>
> If it drops suddenly to zero, that usually means the battery
> itself has been dropping for quite a while and the capacity
> estimation software simply took a long time to catch up.
>
> The kernel's reported voltage level isn't perfect, but it's a lot
> closer to reality than the percent shown in the UI.
>
> Of course, there are other factors which make it a bit awkward...
> like the way battery voltage sags under load then recovers later.
> Play an intensive game and the cell voltage might sag to 3.4V...
> but turn the game and screen off and voltage may recover to 3.8V
> within a couple minutes.  So it can be tricky to convert a
> measurable trait (voltage) into an un-measurable trait (percent
> charge remaining).  And the effective capacity isn't a simple
> graph from volts to percent; it changes with the discharge load
> so it's more of a 3-dimensional graph.  And as the cell ages, the
> 3D mapping from voltage+amperage to percent changes, so it needs
> recalibration once in a while.
>
> -- Selene
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to    : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help  : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
> ,--
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to     : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to