I'm reading the comments on https://design.canonical.com/2016/05/colour-palette-updates/ and I'm wondering how the comments ended up on that page. Can I or someone else add more comments, or is this take for an external source? (Twitter?) -- All the positive voices sound rather selective, a bit like propaganda to me. Don't get me wrong.
I think that "semantic meaning" is indeed imperative. That the aubergine / purple has vanished in the new palette for a light color (that is comparably hard to read, IMHO) is a bit striking though. I'd like to support that observation with a comment of mine in the blog post. Interestingly, the Ubuntu Design website [1] *does* list the aubergine / purple. Which content is more up-to-date, the blog or the Design website? (I recall reading that the latter is scheduled for being updated.) [1] https://design.ubuntu.com/brand/colour-palette Kind regards, Peter 2016-05-20 14:37 GMT+02:00 Rae Shambrook <rae.shambr...@canonical.com>: > Hi all, > > Just to let you know, we have now published a blog post about the new > palette: https://design.canonical.com/2016/05/colour-palette-updates/ > -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
