El d�a Tuesday, June 07, 2016 a las 01:39:28PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Lallement escribi�:
> On 07/06/2016 13:24, Peter Spiers wrote: > >Question, > > > >How does such get passed testing? > It didn't, this is > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1581089. > Some issues are not important enough to block the release compared > to others. I sligthly disagree. I'm using the alarm in my BQ E4.5 since one year on five mornings a week, and until OTA-11 it was never the case that the clock-app stayed open after alarm cancel. This is clearly a regression and I'm asking if for normal (existing) functionality is some standard anti-regression testing in place, i.e. tests to ensure that everything else apart of new features does work as before? matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-176-38902045 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
