On 19 October 2015 at 09:28, Alberto Mardegan < alberto.marde...@canonical.com> wrote:
> In account-polld case, it could work that when account-polld encounters > an authentication failure which requires the user intervention, it would > emit a notification, which once tapped would open the default mail > client. > I want to argue that this logic be placed elsewhere. If/when account-polld becomes unnecessary, we lose this logic. So any code we add to account-polld that we want for all time, essentially becomes technical debt. And if a Google account is broken, who is going to tell the user if account-polld does not “see” it? If account-polld is the canary in the accounts mine, then a broken Google account only accessed by calendard and contacts, will stay silently broken. I'm new to account-polld and I know little about online-accounts, libsignon, etc, so please correct me. :) BR, Jonas
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
