Thanks to all those who work on Ubuntu and long live Canonical. Best regards
---------- Messaggio inoltrato ---------- Da: Olivier Tilloy <olivier.til...@canonical.com> Data: mercoledì 14 ottobre 2015 Oggetto: Curiosity A: Yarid Andrea Guglielmetti <y.a.guglielme...@gmail.com> Hi Yarid, In the future please keep the mailing-list in CC (use Reply to All), this kind of discussion might be of interest to others. See my answer below. On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Yarid Andrea Guglielmetti <y.a.guglielme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks so much for info, like Chrome but love Chromium. Instead this Firefox > implementation is not possible, in this moment? For difficult to porting > Firefox-app to ARM? Or Canonical wants so? bYe There is no plan to port firefox to ubuntu touch, that would be a huge amount of work and doesn’t fit our plans. Cheers, Olivier > Il mercoledì 14 ottobre 2015, Olivier Tilloy <olivier.til...@canonical.com > > ha scritto: >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Yarid Andrea Guglielmetti >> <y.a.guglielme...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thanks Olivier, all this is great! I would also like to ask, instead, >>> what >>> is the API used (for video call) in ubuntu-desktop with only Firefox is >>> install? Can not be used in utouch-next? Greetyng :) >> >> Firefox has its own implementation of WebRTC. The Ubuntu Touch browser >> uses oxide as a web engine, which is based on chromium, which also has >> a WebRTC implementation. We simply need to enable it in oxide, see >> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1505746. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Olivier >>
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
