Hello everybody,
I'm new here and now a bit confused about version numbers.
In my case it was version 127, not 128, that wouldn't boot. Also, at
http://system-image.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch/devel-proposed/flo/ (i'm
using a nexus 7) the highest version is 128. Yet you are discussing 129.
Could somebody help me understand this?
Thanks in advance,
Aat de Vries.
On 03/11/2015 02:01 AM, Alan O'Dannel wrote:
Thanks Victor, I'll reload. Alan
On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:51:51 PM PDT, Victor Thompson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo <
ricardo.salv...@canonical.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Michał Sawicz
<michal.saw...@canonical.com> wrote:
> W dniu 10.03.2015 o 20:41, Alan O'Dannel pisze:
>> Too late. Just found out the hard way.
>
> Confirmed, it never gets past the logo.
>
> To recover, boot to recovery and use
> $ ubuntu-device-flash --revision=127 touch...
The issue was basically because /sbin/initctl was removed from the
image, making the boot to fail completely. inifinity pushed a fix in
live-build and I just started to build 129, hopefully that should be
all good again.
Sorry for the noise, should hopefully be the last remaining bug that
we got as a side effect of migrating desktop to systemd.
Cheers,
--
Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
I can confirm that image 129 works boots as expected.
Victor Thompson
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
