On 01/16/2015 08:25 AM, Ted Gould wrote: > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 20:03 -0200, Martin Albisetti wrote: >> Now that we're approaching convergence with the desktop on the one >> hand, and Snappy on the other, it becomes more common (or in the case >> of Snappy, the only way!) to interact with apps from a command line. >> The reality is, the reverse-domain approach was flawed, as it became >> clear the first time we typed "snappy install >> com.ubuntu.developer.beu...", I go annoyed half-way through. > > Do you know why for snappy it was decided to install by package name instead > of > by application name? It seems that's more what people are looking for. We'd > probably also want to support, in theory, multiple setups of various > applications. So perhaps the way I configure and setup OwnCloud would be more > desirable than the way someone else does it. You'd want to easily allow for > both > to be discoverable in the store. > I'm not sure I understand the distinction here. Can you clarify? (It might simply be semantics since I think of package name and app name as described here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppStore/Interfaces/ApplicationId).
-- Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
