On Oct 11, 2014, at 03:48 PM, Vojtech Bocek wrote: >I've just removed the broken image (version 82) from my >s-i.tasemnice.eu server (the one for hammerhead and deb). The same >thing applies - if you've already downloaded it, don't install it. It >_should_ be safe to update to version 81 though.
I wonder if it makes sense to be able to "blacklist" images more easily. Rather than having to tear down the whole server, we could instead possibly publish a list of blacklisted images which the system-image client would then ignore for upgrade path calculations. I'm not sure whether that would be best described in the index.json, channels.json or some other file. -Barry -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp