On Jul 29, 2014 6:26 PM, "Christian Dywan" <christian.dy...@canonical.com> wrote: > > Hey everyone,
[...] > - Please point out any benefits and drawbacks you see with either API > and reply to this thread Hey Christian, Thanks for your mail with all explanations. I'm on holiday and I had not time yet to see all differences, but I don't see advantages in Ubuntu.Components implementation, but disadvantages. Could you please point me out on which are advantages to fork a component that has all features we need? I mean, unless upstream drops support to this new feature, IMO we don't need a fork that creates incompatibility between our app implementation and standard implementation. Regards, Riccardo P.s: reading again the mail I think could seems ironically or rude, but it's only due my bad English. My mail is really a question: which could be advantages to have our own implementation?
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
