On 02/03/2014 06:42 PM, Michał Sawicz wrote: > On 03.02.2014 22:51, Jamie Strandboge wrote: >> Is this true? Doesn't the untrusted app call out to the trusted online >> accounts >> which is not part of this lifecycle group, and then online accounts calls the >> plugin? The unconfined app talks to online accounts over DBus; I'm not sure >> how >> online accounts would fall under the apps lifecycle group in this case. > > I believe a conversation between the trusted online accounts and shell will > create the binding between app and "untrusted helper", as Ted aptly named > them, > and from then on they will be considered together for lifecycle management, > does > that make sense? > Yes.
> Of course we'll need to make sure that nothing bad happens between trusted > online accounts and the untrusted helper while it's being suspended (or even > stopped, for that matter), but app and untrusted helper need to be considered > whole. Is this part of LP: #1230091 (the window reparenting bug)? If so, I wonder what the status of that bug is-- I've not seen any progress in the bug for some time, yet its needed for a number of other things too. -- Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
