On 26 November 2013 13:58, Sergio Schvezov <sergio.schve...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Ursula Junque <ursi...@ursinha.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Thomi, >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Thomi Richards >> <thomi.richa...@canonical.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Ursula Junque <ursi...@ursinha.net> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> If upstreams don't oppose to that, bugs should only be filed against >>>> Ubuntu packages, discouraging the direct upstream reporting. >>> >>> >>> >>> I think the distinction between upstream and distro is a useful one, and >>> I'd be sad if we started treating them as one and the same (or created a >>> blanket rule about where bugs should be reported, which is effectively the >>> same thing, in my mind). >>> >>> I also believe that the correct place for almost all bugs to be filed is >>> against the upstream projects itself (at least, for the core >>> Canonical/Ubuntu projects - I assume we're having this conversation in the >>> context of canonical-sponsored Ubuntu Touch projects). >> >> >> >> I understand your point, but I'm talking about the policy while dogfooding >> Ubuntu Touch, and as this is testing the distro it would make more sense to >> file bugs against the distro packages and use the distro tools, as ogra >> pointed. As I said, if upstreams see value in having an upstream bugtask >> that can be discussed, but in this case we need to have at least one bugtask >> for the source package, always. >> >> Sebastian (seb128) pointed that having one list of bugs (the distro ones) >> helped a lot for the Settings project, they even "closed" the bugs section >> on the upstream project to ensure bugs would be in a single place (also >> easier to maintain more accurate bug status/progress). We only need to agree >> on a policy so it's clear to everyone how it works. > > > I'm all for this, although there are places where this isn't really going to > reflect reality; two components come to my mind here; phablet-tools and the > sdk itself, which are being offered all the way back to precise on a PPA > (and the emulator as well soon too); > > This is a problem since ubuntu-bug won't find the package and fail. Any > solution to this is welcome.
Packages from PPAs can ship a config file for ubuntu-bug/apport to file bugs in the correct place on launchpad. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
