hi, On Mi, 2013-09-04 at 13:15 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > > Note that this is not really about power consumption. Colin King has > > done analysis of power consumption on Touch devices and the biggest > > bang for the buck is ensuring that sensors are turned off when they > > are not needed, not minimising CPU usage. Instead, please consider > > this proposal an attempt to better ensure the stability and > > performance of Touch systems out in the wild. > > Just to be clear as I feel the above can be misread: It _absolutely is > a top priority_ that we don't have runaway processes consuming > 50,100,150% CPU all the time due to buggy behaviour. Note that fixing > that is also not really "minimising", but rather "fixing waste". > > So yeah, whatever helps us identify and extract info useful for > debugging these cases in automation is more than welcome.
well, this proposal seems to be more about "clean up the mess
afterwards" in case a misbehaving app slipped thought the automated
testing and needs specific runtime handling (as well as automated error
reporting from the running enduser device)
ciao
oli
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
