On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 07:46:51PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:22:47PM +0200, Michał Sawicz wrote: > > > > Because of -o7 (slowest) we saved another 112kB, or 2%. Then, added > > export NO_PNG_PKG_MANGLE=1 to debian/rules and voilá! that's a _lot_ of > > our pandas' time saved. > > Please don't upload packages to the archive with NO_PNG_PKG_MANGLE set, > optimizing PNGs isn't the only thing it does. Maybe we should have a > second flag just for turning off PNG optimization, but the better answer > for many (admittedly, not all) packages is to split PNGs into arch-indep > packages, so they only build on i386.
It's been pointed out that I can't read. I saw NO_PNG_PKG_MANGLE as NO_PKG_MANGLE, completely failing to notice that NO_PNG_PKG_MANGLE is actually a real thing (thanks, Martin). Ignore me. If you want to pre-optimize your PNGs and set the above variable, by all means: do so. Forget the noise. :P ... Adam -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp