I am guessing that might require extra security measures... Zisu Andrei
On 15 March 2013 18:01, Kévin PEIGNOT <peignot.ke...@kpeignot.fr> wrote: > Hope there will be passwords too ^^ > > Le ven. 15 mars 2013 19:00:17 CET, Bill Filler a écrit : > > On 03/15/2013 01:43 PM, Kévin PEIGNOT wrote: > >> Thanks ! > >> > >> That's right, I didn't thought about XUL (not sure it's XUL used in > >> Firefox for Android), and consistency. > >> > >> Then about sync : For me it's really a must have. Sure Mozilla will > >> someday port Firefox on Ubuntu Phone if it's a success, and I will wait > >> this day to use Ubuntu touch on a daily base. The content I see on > >> desktop/phones is almost the same (just mobile or classic version of the > >> same sites), I want history to be synced between my devices, I want my > >> bookmarks, and more of anything else : I NEED my passwords to be synced. > >> And this is right for my professional use too (specially bookmarks) > > No doubt syncing is an important usecase we are targetting. We will > > most definitely use UbuntuOne (and u1db) as the framework to sync > > between devices. Bookmarks, history and tabs will probably be the > > first content to be synced with others coming later. > > > >> > >> About the Webkit vs Gecko war, I'm not expert, but for me it doesn't > >> change anything : I don't care. > >> > >> Thanks for your answers. > >> > >> Kévin > >> > >> Then I sync it should be possible to port Firefox Sync service to any > >> other browser. a > >> Le 15/03/2013 18:05, Michael Zanetti a écrit : > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> Please not that I have not been part of the dicision making on the > browser, > >>> but I might give some ideas on why I for one would not pick firefox as > the main > >>> browser for Ubuntu Touch: > >>> > >>> - Its look and feel is not made for Ubuntu Touch. In my opinion > consistency is > >>> really important and having an application with differnt toolbar, > color and > >>> behavior is a bad thing. > >>> > >>> - It's not Qt. We decided to go for Qt with Ubuntu Touch. All other > >>> applications are written in Qt. That makes it possible to share > libraries > >>> between them. Having to load xul and all others of firefox's > dependencies will > >>> most certainly consume more memory than a browser that can share its > libs with > >>> the rest of the system. > >>> > >>> I could think of more arguments like WebKit vs Gecko, Firefox's > gestures > >>> interfering with Ubuntu Touch gestures etc. Also I think the syncing > bookmarks > >>> is not a totally valid use case as at least for me the content viewed > on the > >>> phone on the go is a totally different one than the one I read/view on > my PC. I > >>> could agree that some poeple might want this though. > >>> > >>> Hope this gives some insight, > >>> Michael > >>> > >>> On Friday 15 March 2013 17:50:58 Kévin PEIGNOT wrote: > >>>> A question about the web browser : > >>>> > >>>> Why don't port Firefox Android on Ubuntu Phone ? It's really great, > >>>> very touch friendly, and it's already possible to sync it with the > >>>> desktop. > >>>> > >>>> If someone has an answer ! > >>>> > >>>> Kévin > >>>> > >>>> Le ven. 15 mars 2013 17:41:43 CET, rdvlaunch...@gmail.com a écrit : > >>>>> Shane, > >>>>> For the browser see: > >>>>> See Ubuntu Development Summit: "Web Browser Application for touch > >>>>> devices" > >>>>> > http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1303/meeting/21621/appdev-1303-apps-webbrowse > >>>>> r/ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> and: > >>>>> https://launchpad.net/webbrowser-app > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
