On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:44:01AM -0400, Ralph Janke wrote: > The issue is not that any term that was used is offensive, it > is deeper subtlety that needs to be addressed.
I wasn't using "offensive" in the sense of "profane", but more in the sense of "problematic." > As Scott has said, we had discussions about that before and at the UDS > to the point that there was the question if there should be a second > "MOTU" group for the KDE packages in universe. Understood, Scott gave a summary in his original e-mail. > So please let's be mindful, that we are one big family and that we are > all following the same goal. We support each other, we are inclusive, > not exclusive! I'm not trying to argue against inclusiveness and cooperation. I just don't understand which part of what was said in the conversation compelled Scott to write an e-mail about it. -- Soren Hansen Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
