> Hi MOTUs, > > Due to lack of time, Reinhard Tartler (siretart) has chosen to resign > as the MOTU Launchpad Liason. William Grant (wgrant) and Morten > Kjeldgaard (mok0) have stepped forward and will share these duties. > > The Launchpad Liason provides Launchpad developers with prioritized > bugs/specs relevant to MOTU and MOTU with information on Launchpad > changes and progress. > > Because of limited time, and also due to the lack of a satisfactory > solutions for conducting a proper poll among the MOTUs, William and > Morten have already -- on behalf of the MOTU -- given the LP developer > team feedback on the priorities of the MOTUs for the LP 3.0 > development cycle (see > https://dev.launchpad.net/VersionThreeDotO/Soyuz/Inputs > column "T"). > > We focussed our attention on features we judged would be of importance > and of concequence to the day-to-day work of the MOTU. > > In the future, we will attempt to find a more satisfactory solution to > getting broader input from the whole team. >
Now that I've read the input, I find that in many significant respects it does not reflect my interests as a MOTU. As an example, "Do an emergent "heat" on PPA's, which would quietly factor in downloads, subscribers, karma of uploaders etc." is listed as #3. I'm fairly certain as a MOTU I really don't care. Another example is "Soyuz instant messenger buddy (XMPP). For notifications of important events like build failures. Probably not limited to Soyuz." I know I don't need that. Email works great for this stuff. I agree with the #1 on the list. I think the general emphasis on PPAs is not relevant for MOTU. I'd like to see stuff about buildd's being more reliable and actually working (as an example, https://bugs.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/311952 is not even on the list). I do not think this can be considered a MOTU input. Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
