On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:20:19 +0100 Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]> wrote: > >I have written up a proposal for an updated workflow for our REVU, >please see: > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/REVUWorkflowProposal . > >The proposal is not wildly different from what we have now, it is more >of a re-structuring. I think it can be implemented with quite few >modfications to the existing software. > >I hope we can discuss this proposal at the next MOTU meeting, I have >taken the liberty of putting the issue on the agenda. > If I understand your proposal correctly, the primary change is to segregate packages that have never been looked at and packages that were advocated at some point from packages that have been reviewed, but have never had an advocate. Is that right?
I can see some potential for benifit with this. It does sound like you are proposing a manual step of marking a package off the "New" list. I think this should be automatic. On a related note, can REVU be subcribed to -changes and taught to auto archive packages after upload? Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
